OK , let me say up front that I love my Uncle Mats guitars. I currently have 8 of them and they're undoubtedly some of the finest mass produced instruments ever made, especially those necks!
That said, what the hell was our beloved Uncle smoking when he designed those stupid brass barrel-saddle bridges?!
I have just finished adjusting the neck and action on my Vantage AV325 (
http://www.matsumoku.org/ggboard/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=5248 ) and I was feeling all pleased with myself and the the results.
THEN I noticed where the strings were!
Both E's were
tapered relative to the fretboard edge, and a couple of others had irregular spacing! ARRGGGHHH!
I had been concentrating on neck, string height and intonation so much it had escaped my awareness until that moment!
It shouldn't have come as a surprise though, it's not like I haven't just gone through the same bloody thing not so long a go on my Westone Thunder I-A (
http://www.matsumoku.org/ggboard/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5063 ).
That drove me nuts too and I'm not looking forward to the next string change!
I play mostly rhythm so I don't often need to venture wa-a-a-y up the neck, but when I do, I expect my fingers to find a string under them!
Is that too much to expect?
This freakin' saddle arrangement is completely idiotic and nonsensical. The strings are forced to be bent and twisted, in, around, and over, all manner of obstacles with the consequence that thy cannot follow a straight line from entry point in the bridge to the the corresponding nut slot. It is maddening beyond reason to try and achieve a parallel set of strings. If you're really lucky the E strings will stay on the fretboard all the way down!
So, the question:Is there a solution to this stupidity? A recommended replacement, of the saddles perhaps? Or a straight swap out with another bridge altogether? I have two otherwise great playing guitars that suffer from this shoddy design. I don't know the Mats' bridge designs well enough to know technically what is compatible with what. Any experts out there care to weigh in on this?