I totaly agree and if you ponder that for a moment it stands to reason.
At the time these were "all new&improved designs". In short,nobody knew about them...and for the most not all that many cared. So..to appeal to customers these guitars just plain had to be "da bomb" vs cost. Something we totaly agree on.
Don´t know if you´re familiar with the LS-700 transition,but two guitars within the same "family" couldn´t be more apart. The LS-600D and LS-700 transition guitars....i don´t really get it as to why they came with the same family name. They´re like comparing apples to oranges as far as i´m concerned. Both VERY VERY competent and well built axes but i´d say it´s fair to state that within reason the two was aimed at two completely different groups of buyers.